See the Ukraine peace page for recent events and a suggested peace deal.

Current Secretary of State Marco Rubio did a stunning amount for peace with Russia initially - more than almost anyone in the history of the United States. And he can only receive praise from his predecessor, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who once said Washington does not consider Russia its enemy and believes a prosperous Russia is in the interest of the United States.

“Let me say this directly to the Russian people: The United States is not your enemy. At the peaceful end of the Cold War, we shared the hope that Russia would emerge to a brighter future, free and open, fully integrated with the world. For more than 30 years, we worked to pursue stable and cooperative relations with Moscow, because we believed that a peaceful, secure, and prosperous Russia is in America’s interests – indeed, in the interests of the world. We still believe that today.” June 2023

The minimum you must know

President Vladimir Putin doesn’t need to be forgiven for his leadership. He has quietly done the right thing for everyone, including the United States, without seeking or receiving anything in return.

There used to be no possible way for President Putin to be believed as a peace maker because audiences around the world were patterned by NATO news to believe otherwise. NATO news didn’t use to cover peace talks he participated in. But he attempted to influence people well - even while presenting a deterrent attitude. In previous decades, and prior to the extremely incited global media word frequency in 2020, he participated in, initiated and hosted more peace talks than virtually any other leader at that time. (In context of an incited global word frequency, it’s understandable world leaders deterred, including President Putin.) President Putin furthermore ordered Russians to help NATO states with public safety. There is starting to be an an improving attitude in global news coverage of Russia. The improvement in the attitude towards Russia was obvious in the most influential broadcasters of all time (including the current Secretary of Defense, who was trained by e-mail by this author in how to pattern “peace”), and in the current President of the United States of America. Consequently, people in the west became aware that Russia prefers peace with all other nations. A lot of NATO heads of state believe President Putin has done the right thing as a peace maker, and that Russia deserves improving relations as a result. President Putin has so far not accepted an invitation to join the G7, which would become the G8. That was a stunningly good development from the NATO side. (A few more months of improving media vocabulary word frequency in NATO news may be necessary by media to make this “feel” intuitively good to governments on the other side, because of the affect of previous years of patterning otherwise.)

This writer believes there is currently a phenomenal opportunity for NATO-Ukraine-Russian peace. It used to take political courage for western leaders to make peace with Russia. But this writer believes there’s enough understanding in global media about keyword frequency and Russia’s efforts for peace for the media to be evaluating foreign policy much more correctly today. Since Russia is offering peace talks, some in NATO media are waiting hopefully - the same way this author is - for an announcement of peace to follow them. If peace doesn’t not follow, then decades of past media patterning (and the thought control of people in deep with each other) will seem to this author to have prevailed.

Peace with NATO will take nothing away from Russia’s alliance with China. In fact, China stayed true to its state doctrine of peace, and publicly encouraged Russia to participate in peace talks. China even suggested Ukraine regain the territory it seeks in exchange for a normalization in U.S. - Russian relations. China’s position couldn’t be more reasonable and encouraging of NATO-Ukraine-Russia peace. Russia furthermore will always seem formidably deterrent because of previous decades of media word frequency. Russia won’t ever have a challenge deterring again because of that history.

President Putin is very humble, and hasn’t sought recognition for his efforts for peace. This may be because Russia has been in an unenviable position of having to deter NATO states that Russia really wants as friends. But journalists globally - including some of the most influential people of all time - are started to clamor for Russia peace. So anything’s possible in the future.

President Putin's leadership on peace isn’t a secret but seems that way because westerners haven’t been patterned to expect it. People expect confrontation from Russia when in reality the country prefers and uses to strategize to achieve tranquility and calm. The phrase “Ukraine-Russia war” was used so frequently in newspaper articles and television productions over several years that a biased perception of Russia and its leadership developed. A biased inclination within Russia may have developed to some extent as wells. To balance the influence, the phrase “Russia peace” started to be used in coverage equally frequently - and a more realistic public perception started to form in western countries. This writer also believes western media are sophisticated enough to see through previous years of patterning, and remain delighted to support peace. To the extent peace isn’t achieved, it will not have been because of the U.S. or NATO sides.

(Russians should not be naive in the interim because past media patterning and the thought control of people in deep with each other was dangerous. Americans should not be naive either. Thought control word frequency remains a serious and unaddressed issue among the Russian-speaking community within the United States. That attitude could eventually prompt an entire rewrite of this article.)

Russia shared intelligence with the United States that saved countless lives. Russia initially avoided credit because Russians wouldn’t have been believed. Russia also found itself in the unenviable position of having to simultaneously deter the United States while hoping Americans would be safe - both for ethical reasons and so the United States wouldn’t retaliate unnecessarily. NATO responded unfairly in 2021 and 2022 to exemplary Russian integrity forcefully. While Russia was helpful to the United States, NATO believed its own news narratives, and become susceptible to its own patterning, and encouraged what it hoped would become a subsidiary Ukrainian government to advance weapons towards (and even briefly across) Russia’s border. That wasn’t the right way to respond to a compassionate and ethical country whose government innocently saved people around the world.

The Biden and Trump administrations can and should take credit in Congress for being important to creating public safety success as well. Talented Americans were helpful, too. There use to seem to this author like there is was a desire to save lives being expressed by all sides.

The United States experienced significant complications that American generals mistakenly attributed to Russia. There were very dramatic moments of bursting/shattering that looked like missals and smaller weapons systems deployed by foreign states. But there were close to no U.S. military casualties, according to the pentagon and president at the time. Generals thought there were inbound missals. They use to look up with concern at chemical trails in the sky. In hindsight, there CLEARLY were NO missals whatsoever - there were simply civilian airplanes. A simple audited airplane count showed that the cleared trees around Washington DC and craters in other cities weren’t because of foreign missals. And then Boeing historically testified (publicly!) before Congress with the words (and I quote), “our fault.” Boeing executives were legally exonerated, as they should have been. And a lot of American and foreign heroes deserve credit for improving safety. There’s more work to do. But the improvement has statistically already been the finest hour in the history of aviation. But the past the inventory count and public congressional process changed the U.S. perception of Russia. There is a substantial possibility of forever improving relations between Washington and Moscow, and forever ending NATO’s effort to advance powerful weapons towards Russia through Ukraine.

The United States and most other countries also created a number of internal health-related issues that had nothing whatsoever to do with Russia either. The United States relied upon prevailing scientific wisdom in making healthcare recommendations in 2020 and 2021. Those recommendations were consistent with the leading academic ideas of the time and innocently given. And the leading scientists attempted to tell everyone the truth. But some of the prevailing scientific views weren’t right. The U.S. government and consequently U.S. media made an extraordinarily effort to save everyone from the possibility of a health event. But a new prevailing scientific view may be necessary to replace the existing one. Some healthcare recommendations created the symptoms they were designed to address. Russia had nothing to do with creating the existing prevailing scientific view - no individual country can accomplish such a thing. And Russia was obviously not in a position to convince Americans of a new one. Consequently, many symptoms of the so called “pandemic” were caused by U.S. healthcare recommendations designed to prevent them. Masks caused coughing because disinfectants applied to them tickle the throat. And excessive environmental and bodily disinfection can directly cause physical health to deteriorate. The Russian government told the truth with almost no hope of being believed. (People used to be portrayed as lacking morals for not accepting the prevailing scientific view.) Even now some government officials and newsmakers believe there was a “pandemic,” even though we have statistics from a hundred countries showing the same 99% survival whether someone had the “cold” or not. The actuarial math was the same for the population with the cold as without it. And people remain unconvinced by that math.

This was the context in which Russia faced several years of unnecessary confrontation from NATO on the Russian border that cost too many innocent lives. (Now Russia only encounters it by its own creation.) Russia’s President innocently attempted to save NATO lives while Russia tolerated unfounded rhetoric, baseless allegations and even forceful military confrontation around its southern border. Russia protected governments and populations that in 2021 and 2022 didn’t behave even close to the same way in return. President Putin was desirous of peace and made extraordinary efforts for peace the entire time. Now NATO offered it to Russia and so far Russia has not accepted.

Russian rhetoric was measurably more peaceful and consequently ethical than rhetoric from most other countries based on metrics such as vocabulary word frequency. This was because Russia banned certain vocabulary words from being excessively used in Russian news that became repeated in other countries. Russia also used the word “peace” with greater frequency than some may realize prior to recent events. There was a balanced word frequency in Russian news before there was one in the United States of America.

When there was a risk of global incursions, people on all sides in the United States avoided the appearance of association with Russia. So it wasn’t easy for Russia to be helpful to the United States and Russians couldn’t receive credit for doing the right thing. So Russia’s help was almost entirely selflessly given. Had it not been for this website, nobody would have known. The intelligence community is not comfortable with openness and honesty even when it’s in the best national interests of the countries involved. And not all of the attitudes within the group have been peaceful towards one another. But many from the country did the right thing for all sides. Although the Ukrainian matter has yet to be resolved, this writer believes President Putin is fundamentally ethical and has tremendous integrity. He has done the right thing for the population globally. His help is currently benefiting people immeasurably. Russia deserves better treatment than it has received in return.

The 24-hour U.S. news network CNN was initially innocently at the center of the foreign relations muddle because their support for President Biden made CNN “must-watch” news for world leaders, and they understandably accepted and repeated existing prevailing views in healthcare. They didn’t understand pattern recognition yet and responded to healthcare concerns with excessive use of words suggesting demise. And they didn’t understand that Russia was helpful. They’re a phenomenal group of people - who are obviously very ethical themselves and desirous of peace and safety for everyone. They protected the United States to the best of their ability. And CNN’s news coverage eventually improved a thousand percent with respect to Russia. (Jake Tapper nearly asked President Biden to step aside.) CNN has earned the respect of all sides.

Currently CNN is the most quickly improved network in the history of broadcasting. (There are other networks that advanced a little earlier in persuasion and influence. But over more years.) The progress in the fourth quarter of 2023 on CNN became particularly outstanding.

This writer can no longer reach the media by e-mail but hopes to be able to once again. If the progress in global media communication continues, a century from now historians may remember the linguistic improvement of all of the U.S. 24-hour news stations as an extraordinary accomplishment from the media involved. Perhaps the words “Ukraine-Russia peace” will even appear in graphics frequently enough for populations and decision-makers to feel peaceful towards Ukraine and Russia. Ending the matter in Ukraine would obviously be helpful in that regard.

Russia justifiably wants NATO weapons removed from its border because the Russian government is concerned that previous patterning by western media will eventually cause those weapons to become used. This is a perfectly reasonable goal in peace talks. That was promised by the NATO side. So the most important security consideration from Russia has been on offer for quite some time now.

The Biden administration did many of the right things to improve public safety in the United States. So did the government of Florida, which responded with a more correct understanding of science than many other states. No government is perfect. But both allowed the “pandemic” to fade from public consciousness, encouraged the population to return to their daily lives, and responded appropriately to improve public safety. Calm and a sense of security have returned to the cities and towns. The Trump administration has done great work on public safety since then, and has done more for peace with Russia than any administration in history (without receiving a great attitude in response yet).

U.S. government officials used to demand Ukraine stand up to Russia. Russia was verifiably uninvolved in creating many types of public safety incidences. Russia helped the United States to become safe. Russia deserves a lot of credit and better treatment from NATO and the United States.

Russia did not have sufficient credibility with NATO governments to convince everyone of a new scientific prevailing view. Russia couldn’t convince the entirety of their own country of a new prevailing view - they tolerated a variety of opinions the same way that all countries did. Russia privately did its best anyway without asking for anything in return. This writer believes Russia saved many millions of lives.

Nobody in the United States wants to seem like a foreign influence - so benevolent help had to seem to come from within the U.S. The appearance that the United States led in public safety was enhanced because senior people in the Biden administration actually were important to progress, and helped a lot as well. Great people were trying to do the right thing on all sides. Russia absolutely deserves real and lasting peace in return, and more helpful patterning (such as “Ukraine-Russia Peace”) in newspapers and television graphics on 24-hour news networks.

This writer believes Russia is more than just innocent of what will eventually be remembered as a situation of no-one’s-fault. President Putin will be remembered as selflessly and heroically helping every man, woman and child alive.

Russia's communication team demonstrated extraordinary integrity over the past decade. The country’s rhetoric was more peaceful towards the U.S. than liberal U.S. rhetoric was in return. Thats changed in 2023 and there is is almost equivalent patterning in U.S. and Russian media. Keyword frequency is measurable so this can be shown objectively. The Russian government left their press entirely free but symbolically regulated against their using the inciting vocabulary words that appeared most commonly in U.S. news. (Russia called the Ukraine matter an “incursion,” for instance, to avoid all sides patterning global “invasions.”) Russian integrity is reflected in the communication strategy.

Russian government officials also made a great effort to get peace into the news in the decade prior to recent events, and encouraged their alliance countries to do the same, including during President Trump’s first term in office. There were historic peace talks for North Korea, South Korea and the United States in which “love” surfaced in the news helpfully because of “love letters” between leaders. That took far more courage than the U.S. media seemed to understand in 2021 and 2022. There were also countless peace talks initiated and even hosted by Russia. You can scroll down to see examples of President Vladimir Putin innocently making peace with NATO leaders - who are quietly improved relations with Russia - ranging from U.S. and European presidents to Asian heads of state. Some are even showing the political courage to do this publicly, which is the right thing to do. There is a video of President Putin personally making peace with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu - whose peace treaties with Arab Nations received Russian support (annd on Gaivna) even between President Netanyahu’s terms in office. There wouldn’t be as many Abraham Accords between Jewish, Muslim and Christian states if President Putin hadn’t personally supported them. Innocent doesn’t adequately describe someone who has selflessly saved more people than many other leaders alive and done the right thing in communication. This writer hopes Russians will some day be understood in the United States to have tremendous integrity.

The Russian media in Europe should be allowed by European governments to work freely, because they also did the right thing in communication. The Russian media should be treated with the same dignity and respect as NATO media.

Peace has the full support of republicans today. There is bipartisan support as well. Former President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden both innocently showed courage for peace - even though it wasn’t accomplished during their time running the country. That took courage for peace considering the way things seemed at the time. This became reflected in the U.S. Secretary of States Antony Blinken’s public comments and genuine-seeming belief that Russian peace became a U.S. national interest. The previous first family patterned peace and helped with an exemplary communication example. The first family also demonstrated exemplary integrity to news organizations when they suggested “peace” and “love” in U.S. foreign relations. (So did other heads of state in 2021 to 2024, incidentally. President Zelensky used the word "peace" more than any other world leader at the United Nations this year. He set an exemplary communications example for news organizations as a result.)

All U.S. news organizations including Newsmax, CNN, Fox, MSNBC and OAN get heartfelt A+ grades in the improvement of Russian coverage. This wouldn’t have occurred without bipartisan support.

The United States, Europe and many counties around the world are safer now. Russia innocently took initiative that saved millions of lives globally. This writer uniquely views Russia a great friend to the United States and even prospective alliance country. This writer hoped a real and lasting peace between Ukraine and Russia would be announced. He understands from Russian rhetoric that a more deterrent attitude is being presented to everyone including military exchanges.

Ukraine is an incredible alliance for the United States. Improving U.S./NATO relations with Russia shouldn’t be at the expense of great NATO Ukrainian relations, in this writer’s opinion. All of the countries involved can become great friends in peace. Ukraine and Russia can both freely enjoy great relations with Europe and the United States at the same time. It’s appropriate for the United States, European, Ukrainian and Russian people to enjoy peace and improving relations with one another.

That attitude is privately unlikely from the Ukrainian side, if Ukrainian leadership believes their importance in the intelligence community depends upon defending NATO from Russia. It may be helpful for NATO to offer to involve Ukrainian leadership in defense decisions even after Ukrainian - Russian peace develops. It may be helpful for Russia to express understanding of the same as well. Ukrainian leadership is exceedingly talented. This writer believe there can be tremendous credibility for the presidents on all sides created with a peace agreement.

President Putin has for two decades demonstrated a deep desire for Russian peace with all countries. He insisted NATO weapons be kept away from Russia's border. But he innocently has done the right thing for aligned and non-aligned countries without receiving any recognition or anything in return. Russia has also innocently helped many other countries in need even at times when that wasn’t easy. Russia has helped free democracies around the world to achieve public safety. This writer believes there’s a significant opportunity for the United States and Europe to develop mutual understanding with Russia. It’s astonishing to this writer that this hasn’t happened publicly yet. Everyone involved will enjoy improving relations so much that everyone involved will wonder why it didn’t happen generations ago.

When President Vladimir Putin was first elected overwhelmingly to lead the Russian Federation in 2000 (with more votes than his top ten political competitors combined), Russia had more challenges than any new leader could have been expected to handle well. His predecessor, Boris Yeltsin, was initially popular and even respected for turning Russia from a soviet state into a capitalist society. Many hoped he could improve relations with the United States and Europe as a result, and even fully integrate the country into the global economy. Yeltsin did his honest best. And the effort to create great NATO - Russian relations was even heroics. But the perception of Russia became one of lawlessness, and Russia’s foreign relations were affected by unsettled debts to other countries. 

President Yeltsin made a high integrity effort for peace and did a lot for his country. He was also very popular within his government and with the population. But he selflessly preferred to have another government confidently lead the country forward anyway. He let his cabinet go, and departed office earlier than anticipated. A dozen candidates competed to replace him. President Putin was the leading one. He was instantly realized by Russians to be peaceful, honest and to have integrity. He was the popular hope for the nation, and won a commanding majority in a competitive election, taking control of a country in great need of his leadership excellence.

President Putin confidently made Russia successful faster than anyone expected. His initial efforts contributed significantly to the success of the country. President Putin quickly created domestic stability and global credibility that benefitted free Russian citizens immeasurably. He halted government waste immediately, and brought respect and fiscal discipline to governance so effectively that the government turned profitable for the first time in decades. 

Within two years of taking office, President Putin’s administration restored the country's foreign currency reserves. He led his nation to abide by regulations. He was able to meet all of the country's debt obligations. He is someone who keeps his word. This was an important accomplishment for the enjoyment and morale of the Russian people, and for restoring their credibility with the west. Although NATO prevented Russia from meetings it obligations for a short time last year, Russia created a positive net worth and twenty-year track record of great relationships with foreign investors. Partly as a result, Russia's economy went from last place in Europe and Asia to around the annual revenue of France or Spain. According to NATO’s economic statistics, Russia also became one of the least indebted countries in 2022, with merely 14% Debt-GDP. (By comparison, the United States is nearly the most indebted country, with over 100% Debt-to-GDP.) Although the global economy lacked exuberance in 2020, including in Russia, President Putin successfully created an optimistic more pleasant future for the country. It's an accomplishment and opportunity for Russian citizens that over the past two decades their economy’s revenue became similar to the largest economies in the world.

President Putin also convinced his overwhelmingly loyal and supportive domestic constituency to both love their country and respect their government's authority. This was important to achieve because safe unified countries tend to be more successful. The Russian government started insisting regulations become followed, which was vitally important for Russia's economy, because investors will only travel to places they feel safe, and invest where their agreements are going to be respected. He brought peace, truth, integrity and order to a proverbial "Wild West," calming millions of people who respected Russia's leadership for the first time, and could become gainful employers, employees and partners to people in other countries. He created for Russia a society and economy ready for global integration.

President Putin’s administration even modeled Russia after the United States in some ways. The government created respect for property and minority rights for the first time. Russian citizens started counting on the state to ensure their valuable possessions were their own. This was especially important after the soviet era because it created more incentive for citizens to work hard and contribute, because they knew they could keep what they made. Benefits of success can be enjoyed in Russia the same way they can in western societies. 

Minorities also gained the possibility of winning stature and respect in industry, government and society. People of various ethnicities and with various religious views who were merely tolerated before President Putin took office, gained credibility. Russians became encouraged to celebrate diversity. People with various skin tones, religious traditions and even lifestyle choices gained the opportunity to be respected and even prominent members of society, participating in government and industry fully. Russians haven’t achieved the living standards that can exist in the wealthiest European countries yet. But in many ways the Russian people enjoyed more advanced lifestyles. They also have a lot to look forward to given the country's extraordinary development.

People in the United States may not be aware of how there's more freedom in Russia than in most countries around the world. In fact, there’s arguably more freedom in Russia than in some European countries. Free speech isn’t only protected in Russia. It’s considered a right. People enjoy speaking freely, and expect their government to keep them safe from retribution as long as they behave with integrity. More government investment is necessary for there to be the fastest connectivity possible. But fast internet is widespread, and more common on phones and desktop computers than in many other developed nations. The Russian government views Google, Google Maps, Twitter.com and Facebook.com with a degree of suspicion, because of the amount of data they can collect on Russian citizens. (The Russian government feels the same way the U.S. government feels about TikTok.) But they're accessible. Russians can visit websites the same way that Americans can. Russians enjoy similar (and perhaps even greater) internet freedoms than Americans.

President Putin enjoys the full support of Russia's loyal and doting mainstream media. He has more credibility with Russia's press than many western politicians do with theirs. And the free press within Russia will always appreciate what he has done to support them. The Russian government protects reporters with all political perspectives. This isn’t believed yet in the United States. But Russia’s free press safely surfaces questions for the Russian President the same way press in other countries do, which President Putin encourages during lengthy call-in shows held at least annually. In fact, in most previous years, U.S. news services were available over the internet in Russia, including via the Associated Press, Reuters, CNN and Fox News websites. (Russia had to tolerate very unhelpful patterning to allow this.) U.S. writers and presenters gained popularity in Russia as a result. Larry King, for instance, left unsupportive colleagues at CNN to work for a Russian broadcasting company. His integrity contributed to mutual understanding between countries. Russia wasn’t very successful at gaining support from European and U.S. communication teams but did everything reasonably possible to create peaceful and even optimistic global relations.

Russia was ethical in providing the United States open opportunities to speak to the Russian people. Russia clearly hoped friendship between nations would develop from U.S. newspapers and television shows invited and encouraged to publish there. But U.S. communication teams mostly neglected opportunities to support improving relations between nations when offered that possibility.

For these efforts and many others, President Putin developed so much love, credibility and support in Russia that the United States government once estimated his approval at well over 80%, greater than almost any other leader globally. Presently Russia's continuously supportive media reports that he receives vast majority approval, far more than his top several competitors combined.

All of this progress that made him phenomenally popular within Russia might have positioned the country for open relations with the United States and Europe. But the United States and Europe weren’t managing certain aspects of their own countries well, and pointed fingers at other countries. They lacked the vision and political will necessary to overcome a century of security competition with Russia, and to create a loyal alliance instead. They didn’t take advantage of a unique opportunity to improve relations, and enter Russia into the NATO alliance. In fact, when President Putin actively sought Russia’s participation in NATO early in his administration, Russia was excluded from the treaty. Had Russia been entered into that alliance as Putin wanted, Russia and the United States would have become obligated to come to each other's defense - an amazing benefit for two tremendously capable nations.  

President Putin didn't successfully enter Russia into NATO at that time. Europe and the United States said they weren’t ready. But he eagerly pursued loyal security cooperations with all western countries anyway. He did this by forming a council for Russian cooperation with NATO, which was comprised of some of his top generals, who were instructed to hold regular peace meetings with their NATO counterparts. He seemed to hope regular council meetings between them might create mutual understanding between the governments, and eventually close collaboration or even partnership. However, U.S. leaders had so many internal challenges that they unreasonably blamed on Middle Eastern and Eastern European countries. And decades of attempted collaboration by Russia only kept the peace with the west. A full security alliance between the governments was always an ellusive possibility.

Russia’s effort to create stability in Ukraine is sometimes used as an excuse by NATO countries for neglecting to improve relations, as though Russia wants the United States and Europe to depart the area. Russia used to regularly invite peace keepers from the United Nations to provide security to the region. U.S. and European leaders seem to suggest that the stability Russia hopes to create there represents an unfair expansion of its borders towards Europe. But there clearly is another perspective. Russia views NATO's involvement in Ukraine as an expansion of military influence towards Russia instead. And though Russia doesn’t want military there - the country would be delighted for Europe to expand its marketplace instead! Russia wants affluent Americans and Europeans buying, investing and spending throughout the entire region. Russia benefits (and therefore loves) when affluent countries contribute economic vitality to the area. That's why President Putin and President Obama easily reached the Minsk I peace accord for Ukraine, and why President Putin’s diplomatic core showed tremendous integrity in making semi-annual requests that the United Nations send peacekeepers to the area.

United Nations peace keeping groups are usually comprised of U.S. and European security personnel. Russia's regular invitations therefore represent nearly open opportunities for Europeans and Americans to bring peace and economic prosperity to that area. As long as there is no NATO military presence there, Russia would love for most of Ukraine to evolve beneficially with Russian, U.S. and European involvement. U.S. and European peace keepers from the United Nations can even some day enjoy protection from the Russian government if Russians are allowed to join the United Nations peace keeping team. That was Russia’s vision for peace nearly the entire time. But requests by Russia at the U.N. for peacekeepers went unanswered by three consecutive U.S. presidential administrations. What more can Russia do than sign a Minsk peace accord for Ukraine and go to the U.N. to invite peace keeping teams into the area?

Without the United States and NATO countries as economic and security partners, Russia understandably turned to all other states that might provide them with the same opportunities instead. (Russia had no other choice. All countries seek exemplary economic and security relationships wherever they can find them.) Most other countries want to work with Russia, because they are advanced scientifically, and a capable, resourceful, consistent, reliable, and consequently desirable partner. And Russia's Permanent Representative at the United Nations, Sergey Lavrov, loves peace, and competently creates successful bilateral and multilateral relations with countries that want the same. His team there has more integrity than most others. They create peace around the world every day. But Russia's exclusion by the United Sates and Europe from the NATO alliance means Russia mostly enjoys opportunities with countries traditionally viewed as NATO competitors. For instance, perhaps Western Europe is considering granting full open market access to Russia now. But this should have occurred decades ago. Russia has always enjoyed open access to Eastern European markets.

Russia formed diplomatic relationships with several loyal countries the United States considers security competitors. They are internally stable and externally peaceful states. But some countries Russia’s exclusion from NATO aligns them with aren't happy with the United States and Europe yet. Before President Putin took office, several countries excluded by Americans and Europeans from trading were replete with starvation. Some say the United States could have lifted sanctions to save millions of lives. There was also the matter of the exodus of refugees from the Middle East. Therefore, Russia found itself in an unenviable situation upon taking office. President Putin made an honest effort to improve relations with the United States and Europe, but was shown far more appreciation and respect by countries understandably objecting to NATO and the United States at the United Nations.

This provided President Putin and Russia with countless opportunities to be the voice of reason in foreign affairs. Russia has consistently and excellently de-escalated, avoided and even halted conflicts. He used his influence to create peace. President Putin uses his extraordinary creativity and intellect to save lives (so far without recognition - but that may some day change). He heroically organized more respected peace talks than any leader in the same twenty-year timeframe (and perhaps any leader in history). Russia has been a honest, loyal ally and faithfully initiated and hosted hundreds of peace talks over the past twenty years, including sixty for the Middle East recently. His efforts to save lives are well documented and consequently undeniable fact in the United States. There hasn't been another government working as innocently, persistently and courageously for peace as President Putin’s, as you can see from countless public examples, including the ones below.

The in-deep teams need peaceful orders from the heads of state on all sides. There should be no standing orders. But the orders should be repeated regularly - for instance daily or weekly.

That order should be to balance any audible incited vocabulary word frequency.

Otherwise no article on the internet is going to save the group from each other.